NEITHER CANDIDATE GETS THE MESSAGE! PRESIDENT'S DO NOT SACRIFICE OUR LIBERTIES & FREEDOMS FOR:
A free Iraq will help secure Israel

By V.K. Durham
10/1/04



THE MESSAGE, MR. PRESIDENT & MR. KERRY IS:
PRESIDENT'S DO NOT SACRIFICE AMERICANS LIBERTIES & FREEDOMS, EDUCATION, HEALTH & WELFARE AND FUTURE GENERATIONS "SECURING ISRAEL."




By: V.K. Durham
http://www.theantechamber.net

Received the following e-mail this am from a source who shall remain anon... which sort of p*ssed me off, as it must have millions of other Concerned Americans.

  These Presidents & Presidential Candidates have absolutely no idea as to the needs of Americans!? They have no idea as to the horrific daily struggles Americans are having; WITHOUT JOBS, WITHOUT MANUFACTURING, WITHOUT INDUSTRY PRODUCT OF "MADE IN THE U.S.A. GOODS;" AMERICANS HAVE IN JUST TO KEEPING A ROOF OVER THEIR HEADS and FOOD IN THE POT!

A Presidents' Duty is FIRST, LAST AND ALWAYS; "TO HIS OWN NATION OF PEOPLES!"

SOMEONE TAKE THEM (SOMEONE PLEASE, TAKE THEM ) these new fangled Politically Correct POLY-TICIANS now a'days as they look at all the poor folk! You want to know how they "look down on the poor folks needing bare essentials?!"

WELL! You should have the TV Show "SWAPPING WIVES" aired this week RE-AIRED! Here was this MULTI-MILLIONAIRE "NEW YORK WIFE" who never lifted a finger for anything other than eating bon-bon's.. with FOUR NANNIES to watch over her children as she "ate the bon-bon's and shopped till she dropped".. who switched places with an average American Home-Maker who worked at TWO JOBS i.e., splitting wood for fireplaces and home stoves, and driving a school bus.

The FOUR NANNY "Millionaire Wife's Husband" enjoyed PUTTING DOWN the lady with TWO JOBS who just simply wanted to make a home for the family, take care of the children, and cooking the family meals.

The MILLIONAIRE WIFE was a bitch to the "working class family"...she was above "working or doing any house-hold chores"..

And that, Ladies and Gents is how this POLY'TICIAN group looks at the Jobless and Homeless American People AS THIS NATION HAS GONE OFF IT'S INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS, LIBERTIES & CIVIL RIGHTS "CONSTITUTIONAL TRACK!"

There is no reason we should be sacrificed over ISRAEL. The Israelites were literally given a "free" nation of her own...after it was taken from "others" to give to her.

She has grown unruly and THE TRUE JEWS (TORAH) want nothing to do with her, due to her ABUSIVE TACTICS.

There is a difference between THE JEW and THE ISRAELI...even though one has pretended to be the other for over a thousand years.. For those who can read; Read your Bible. Revelations. Ch. 3. Vs. 9,10 & 11.

These Presidents, Congressmen/women and Senators should have the COMMON SENSE to realize "You do not destroy your own nation by continually taking from your nation to give to another, that does absolutely nothing to get its-self "in sync with the Global Community Common Laws of THE COMMON PEOPLE ; FOR the Common Good of all concerned."

NONE OF OUR LEADERS "GETS THE MESSAGE"...?!

I don't like getting involved in Religion or Politics... But, someone had to acknowledge the facts, step aside from THE PATRIOT ACT, Recognize the INHERENT, INVIOLABLE RIGHTS TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST THIS ENDANGERMENT OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL NATION, and to have THE DOWN RIGHT, OLD FASHIONED GUTS to make the statements made herein.

Everyone PLAYS the RELIGIOUS "HARP"... Forget the RELIGIOUS "HARP"... THIS INVOLVES YOUR LIVES, YOUR LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS!

You want to know the BARE ASSED TRUTH!? A. Hitler was also concerned about the DESTRUCTION OF CHRISTIAN'S and CHRISTIAN BELIEFS....

Have none of you wondered WHY none of his speech's have been translated from GERMAN to ENGLISH?

I have----! THIS ZIONIST-COMMUNIST "ANTI-CHRISTIAN" movement is happening all over again...and we are the TARGETED CONTINENT.


READ THE FOLLOWING
----- Original Message ----- From: Undisclosed
To: V.K.
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:16 AM
Subject: A FREE IRAQ WILL HELP SECURE ISRAEL


(snip)
BUSH: Let me first tell you that the best way for Iraq to be safe and secure is for Iraqi citizens to be trained to do the job.

And that‘s what we‘re doing. We’ve got 100,000 trained now, 125,000 by the end of this year, 200,000 by the end of next year. That is the best way. We’ll never succeed in Iraq if the Iraqi citizens do not want to take matters into their own hands to protect themselves. I believe they want to. Prime Minister Allawi believes they want to.

And so the best indication about when we can bring our troops home—which I really want to do, but I don‘t want to do so for the sake of bringing them home; I want to do so because we’ve achieved an objective—is to see the Iraqis perform and to see the Iraqis step up and take responsibility.

And so, the answer to your question is: When our general is on the ground and Ambassador Negroponte tells me that Iraq is ready to defend herself from these terrorists, that elections will have been held by then, that their stability and that they‘re on their way to, you know, a nation that‘s free; that’s when.

And I hope it‘s as soon as possible. But I know putting artificial deadlines won’t work. My opponent at one time said, “Well, get me elected, I’ll have them out of there in six months.” You can‘t do that and expect to win the war on terror.

My message to our troops is, “Thank you for what you‘re doing. We‘re standing with you strong. We’ll give you all the equipment you need. And we’ll get you home as soon as the mission’s done, because this is a vital mission.”

A free Iraq will be an ally in the war on terror, and that‘s essential. A free Iraq will set a powerful example in the part of the world that is desperate for freedom. A free Iraq will help secure (1)Israel. A free Iraq will enforce the hopes and aspirations of the reformers in places like (2)Iran. A free Iraq is essential for the security of (3)this country.



(snip2)
KERRY: Secretary of State Colin Powell told this president the Pottery Barn rule: If you break it, you fix it.

Now, if you break it, you made a mistake. It‘s the wrong thing to do.

But you own it. And then you’ve got to fix it and do something with it.

Now that‘s what we have to do. There‘s no inconsistency. Soldiers know over there that this isn’t being done right yet. I‘m going to get it right for those soldiers, because it’s important to (1)Israel, it’s important to (2)America, it’s important to the world, it’s important to the fight on terror.

But I have a plan to do it. He doesn’t.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6146353/





TRADITIONAL JEWS DISTURBED BY CONNECTION TO ISRAEL
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/Newsletters/jaz090204.htm

Traditional Jews are disturbed by the increasing frequency of references to Jews and the “Jewish state” in political rhetoric and speeches, such as heard at the recent conventions of both political parties.

Continual references to the “Jewish State” convey the impression that all Jews support the so-called “State of Israel”.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  The movement to create the Zionist state of “Israel” which began 100 years ago is in total contradiction to the teachings of Jewish Law and tradition which for 4000 years has commanded Jews to remain unswervingly loyal to the countries in which they reside and prohibits the establishment of a “Jewish State.”

Traditional Jews do not support the Zionist state.  They do not support dual loyalty and believe that referring to the Zionist state of Israel as the “Jewish state” endangers Jews worldwide. It promotes such misguided ideas as “dual loyalty” and erroneously places blame on all Jews for the actions of the Zionist Jews.

It is time to set the record straight.  Traditional Jews do not endorse the actions of the Zionist state nor do they endorse political or financial support of the Zionist “state of Israel”.  Traditional Jews residing in America are loyal to one country only, the United States of America. Any implied connection to or perceived support of the “state of Israel” only serves to fuel continued conflict and anti-Semitism.

Zionist Jews seek media attention to further their cause. Traditional Jews do not seek nor want media or political publicity and implore our politicians and news organizations to remove the spotlight from American Jews and focus on the issues of interest to all Americans of every faith.





Is the American Presidency compromised???

In the days and weeks preceding this Presidential Debate, The American people were somewhat made aware by several media sources addressing the issue of just how well debates today are scripted. Everyone watching these debates[sic] should keep this in mind as they watch what unfolds.

It is generally the playwright of whom writes a script for the actors to perform ...and The End of a scripted story is most surely known before it is played out on the stage.

Is it under threat that each actor will (maybe reluctantly) assume the role assigned and perform for the audience a convincing script?

Is it time for Americans to stop focusing their attention on WEDGE ISSUES and start finding out just what is going on behind the scenes ....or is it already too late?

As Americans are manipulated, Politically heaved to and fro, ever more violently vacillating Left to Right, Right to Left on this Ship of state .....Is this Ship soon to be capsized ...and Balkinized maybe via Secession?

Is it of more importance to whom we elect, Or is it really about the Rights and Power we are manipulated into giving away in fear thereafter to that who is elected?

I wonder???

LA S



[quote]
Because the amount of debt created by BONUS 3392 is so large that the global economy could be brought to collapse through its misuse, agreements have been finalized to allow the hypothecation of portions of the debt (through the use of contracts or deeds of assignment or leasing agreements) pursuant to the following rules and restrictions:
   While prior use of the contract/certificate is noted, the parties using it will not be named in this document. Should such parties refuse there cooperation in the future, they may be named.

[End quote]
http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/DocGroupG/Gpage4.html




Marine Declares War on Bush
By Michelle Goldberg
Salon.com

(snip)
During the Iraq war, he served as national spokesman for the Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve, which is charged with enforcing the law that protects the jobs of reservists called up for military duty. He soon realized that many employers were openly flouting the law and firing soldiers, who were then left with little recourse except lengthy litigation. Extended tours in Iraq were plunging many reservist families into economic misery. "It was bad, but we didn't know how bad it was," Brozak says.

To find out, he volunteered to lead a study for the military about the effects of the Iraq war on reservists and National Guardsmen. Last summer, he was sent to Kuwait and to southern Iraq to interview such soldiers about their call-ups.

What he found was anxiety and rock-bottom morale that boded ill for reenlistment. "They were completely unsure of whether or not they'd be financially taken care of," he says. "They were unsure of whether or not they'd have jobs to come back to. They were certain they were going to get out of the Guard or reserves system when they were done."

Meanwhile, the situation on the ground shocked him. "The number of people there and how they were prepared in terms of equipment and training was, across the board, criminal in terms of its inept management," he says.

He saw the potential for calamity. "What we are faced with today is our active duty force stretched to the breaking point," he says. "The National Guard and reserve systems are broken, possibly beyond repair. We are staring down the barrel of the draft."

"Do the math," he continues. "How many people do we need going forward? How many people do we have? Where are these bodies coming from?"

When Brozak returned from the Middle East to his post in Arlington, Va., he tried to alert civilians in the Defense Department to the trouble on the ground. But, he says, they were uninterested. "It was that same arrogant, contemptuous attitude. When I came back and said we have a problem, we need to address it right away, we are fighting for our lives, their attitude was, 'We know better than you do.' It was their contempt for the people in uniform, it was their contempt for all Americans" that finally drove him out of the Republican Party.

In fact, Brozak says, Republicans' contempt for soldiers -- coupled with their mawkish reverence for the military in the abstract -- had been bothering him for a while. He first started souring on his party when the Bush team smeared John McCain during the 2000 primaries; he was outraged by the 2002 attacks against Democratic Sen. Max Cleland, who was tarred as a traitorous ally of Osama bin Laden despite the fact that he lost three limbs serving in Vietnam.

Brozak changed his party registration shortly after he returned from Iraq last year, but he didn't speak out against the Bush administration until he retired from the Marines this spring. The fact that he waited until he'd left the military didn't stop his old party from going after him. A Republican operative, he says, filed a complaint against him under the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from partisan political activity.

It's likely to get a lot uglier. Ferguson recently paid $20,000 to Benjamin Ginsberg, the Washington lawyer who resigned from the Bush campaign this summer after revelations about his ties to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. The congressman's ties to the right-wing attack machine are well known in New Jersey. "When the political mud starts flying, it seems that U.S. Rep. Mike Ferguson is always in the right place at the right time," Tom Moran, a columnist for the New Jersey Star Ledger, wrote on Sept. 7. "His opponents get smeared. And he has enough distance from the action to claim he knew nothing about it."

Brozak, meanwhile, is going on the offensive. He recently hired one of the state's high-profile election attorneys, Angelo Genova, to ask the state's department of elections to review whether Ferguson is even eligible to run for Congress in New Jersey. As Brozak revealed on Tuesday, Ferguson claims his primary residence in Bethesda, Md., on his Maryland tax forms, thus qualifying for a tax rebate. The Constitution, though, requires that congressmen live in the states they represent. The Web site PoliticsNJ.com has already speculated on possible last-minute replacements, should Ferguson be thrown off the ballot, saying, "This is New Jersey, where anything can happen."

Meanwhile, Brozak continually pounds away at Ferguson's integrity. He notes over and over that earlier this year Ferguson was fined $210,000 by the Federal Election Commission for illegally financing his 2000 campaign with money borrowed from a trust fund set up by his father. Brozak also points out that Ferguson has received $10,000 from House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's ARMPAC, which is at the center of several money-laundering indictments.

(For the rest of the story)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/100104X.shtml




See Also:

RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT VS. CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT OFFICERS IN OFFICES OF PUBLIC TRUST
By V.K. Durham
10.2.04
http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/RespGovVsCriminalGov.htm




Ask not what your Country can do for you,
Ask what you can do for your Country.


V.K. Durham,
CEO-Signatory
PO Box 113
Ida Grove, Iowa 51445 U.S.A.
Telephone (712) 364-3830




www.theantechamber.net

2003